Controversy erupts over New York Times article speculating about Taylor Swift’s sexuality

The publication of a guest column speculating about the sexuality of pop star Taylor Swift has sparked controversy and backlash online. The lengthy 5,000-word essay, which was published in the opinion section of a newspaper, suggests that Swift may be sending signals to her fans about her queerness, despite publicly identifying as straight.

The piece, written by Anna Marks, an editor for the newspaper’s opinion section, string together a list of instances where Swift has seemingly hinted at her queerness. It cites subtle clues in her artistry that suggest she may be queer. Additionally, Marks referenced the inner turmoil of queer country musician Chely Wright and her struggle with coming out.

In response to the publication, Swift’s camp called the column “invasive, untrue, and inappropriate.” Chely Wright also criticized the essay as “triggering,” expressing her dismay over the public discussion of someone’s sexuality.

While Swift has never publicly identified as queer, she has been a vocal advocate for LGBTQ+ rights. She has been linked to high-profile men in the past, and her dating life has been a subject of public interest and speculation.

The controversy surrounding the publication has sparked a debate about the ethics of speculating about celebrities’ sexual orientation and the importance of taking individuals at their word. Critics argue that it is important to believe people when they disclose their sexuality, regardless of their public image or the interpretation of their art.

The essay has ignited discussions about the representation of queerness in the media and the responsibility of publications in reporting on celebrities and their personal lives. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the publication and Swift herself will address the backlash and criticism surrounding the controversial guest column.

Leave a Reply