Amid PUV consolidation deadline, jeepney drivers fear loss of livelihood
Jeepney drivers and operators express concern over the looming public utility vehicle consolidation deadline, stating that they have no alternative sources of income if banned from plying their routes.
Unconsolidated jeepney drivers and operators face the risk of losing their livelihood if the Supreme Court does not issue a temporary restraining order on the memorandum circulars from the Department of Transportation (DOTr) and the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB).
The government has suggested Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) courses as a way for drivers to learn new skills for alternative income. However, many drivers feel this proposal is unnecessary, as they have already proven their skills by obtaining a professional driver’s license.
The proposal has been met with resistance, with drivers questioning the need to undergo further training when they already hold valid licenses.
Jeepney drivers argue that the proposed TESDA courses could pose an additional burden, especially for those with families to support. The current transport strike, which began on April 29 and will end on Wednesday, is part of the ongoing protest against the PUV Modernization Program.
In an effort to salvage their livelihoods, jeepney drivers have filed a petition before the Supreme Court seeking a temporary restraining order on the PUV consolidation deadline. They argue that the program will bring financial strain, as operators will be required to acquire “modern jeepneys” at high costs.
The drivers are hopeful that the Supreme Court’s intervention will prevent a transport crisis and provide them with a viable alternative to adapt to the modernization program without losing their source of income.
